There can be no doubt at this point that the vaccine is more likely to harm young and healthy people than to do them any good. However, the vaccination effort persists, targeting specifically the young. The argument used is that this is for the common good. Vaccines may do no good for young individuals, but they do a lot of good for the totality of the population, especially the old and weak. The young must take the vaccine out of solidarity and respect for the older generation.
This argument draws from the Bible, in which the young are told to respect the old. However, the context is wrong, and the argument is a trick of the devil. The word respect has been used to cover up for the fact that a vaccine shot is not an act of respect. It's an act of sacrifice. The young and healthy are sacrificed at the altar of the old and infirm. This is taken straight out of Lucifer's teaching. But if we point this out, people will stare blankly at us. Who are we to judge the life of some above that of others? If we can save x number of lives by sacrificing y number of people, and x is larger than y, then it makes sense to vaccinate people.
As all things Lucifer came up with, there's a flaw in his logic. None of his teachings make sense when delved into. The only ones benefiting from his way of thinking is a small group of people who profit off of the imbalances and miseries that follow from his teachings. In the case of the plague, we have politicians and the corporate elite profiting off of the misery of everybody else. In case of the vaccine, we have industries making a killing at the loss to the overall population.
The error in their argument is that every life is equally worth. However, this is not the case. The lives of young people are more worth than the lives of old people. God's call on us to protect our young with our lives if necessary is not some irrational Christian idea. It's a moral axiom based on the fact that a life is worth the number of quality years it has left to live. My life is less worth then that of my children, and my parents' lives are less worth than my life.
My parents, my children and myself live lives of roughly equal quality. Hence, our lives can be compared by the number of years we have left to live. My parents can expect to live about 5 more years. I can expect to live about 35 more years. My children can expect to live about 70 more years. This means that every life in my children's generation corresponds to 14 lives in my parent's generation, and 2 lives in my generation, and my life is 7 times more worth than that of my parents.
Once this is understood, it's clear that the focus on number of dead people, without regards to age is beyond misleading. It's evil. It obscures the fact that we'll all die one day, and that the only tragic deaths are those that happen in relatively young people. There's nothing tragic about aunt Augusta's death. To include her in the statistics as if it was a tragedy is misleading. To say that the death of a 13 year old boy due to the vaccine as somehow equal to aunt Augusta's death is evil. Augusta had no more than six months left to live. The boy had 75 years left in him. He had 150 times as much life in him than Augusta. All the good moments were still in his future while they were most definitely in her past.
If the focus ever shifts from number of deaths to number of quality years lost, it will be clear to everyone that the plague was never a tragedy and that the true tragedy is the years we're about to see lost to the vaccine. But this will not happen anytime soon, because the only argument still holding the official narrative together is Lucifer's inversion, with its flawed logic and evil consequences.
 |
| Paradise lost |
No comments:
Post a Comment