From looking at Google trends, it's clear that there has of late been more searches for Nuremberg code than Nuremberg trials. This may sound like a trivial distinction. However, the trials and the code are not as closely related as they may seem. The code is not a product of the trials. Rather, it's a document inspired by the trials. It's an expansion on the Hippocratic oath, with emphasis on medical experiments. As such, it's merely a guideline. It has no legal connotation. No-one can be charge for having broken the Nuremberg code; at least not for now.
But none of this matters at the moment. The elite is in control of the judiciary system. There won't be a trial held against the vaccine pushers any time soon. However, legality and ethics are not the same thing. The significance of the recent interest in the Nuremberg code is not about law. It's about ethics. The code is well formulated and clear as to the current state of things. What's going on is unethical. If it wasn't for the cover of law, vaccine pushers would be exposed as the criminals that they are.
This means that criminal cases may be made against vaccine pushers some time in the future. If the current elite is pushed aside by a revolution, the stage will be set for court cases, punishment and retribution.
 |
| The social contract |
No comments:
Post a Comment