Next Year's Bio-Weapon

There's a worrying aspect to the Wuhan lab theory that has been largely ignored. Namely the possibility that there were sinister motives behind the leak, and that mass-vaccination was the intended goal. The objective may have been to first mark the enemy with a vaccine, and then release a subsequent virus that targets the vaccinated.

This is not as far fetched as it may sound. The lab was doing military grade research, and this type of thinking is common among military men. The idea is to first trap the enemy by making them unwittingly expose themselves to an attack, and then follow this up with a decisive blow.

If this is the motive behind the push to get us vaccinated before next year's flu season, we're up against some truly dark forces. However, we don't have to be paranoid in order to be concerned. Even if no sinister motive was behind the plague of 2019, the fact remains that there are weapon grade bio-labs where researchers look for ways to target and destroy enemies. To think that they will ignore the obvious opportunity implicit in vaccines as targeting agents would be naïve.

With millions of people currently vaccinated in some way against the plague, we can be sure that someone somewhere is looking into ways to turn this against us. There will also be people working to promote one type of vaccine over another, because some vaccines are more easily tricked into attacking the host. However, this should not lead us to believe that there's a vaccine out there that's impossible to target. All vaccines leave a mark and a predictable response that can be targeted. The only difference is the degree and ease to which these responses can be turned against us.

This is why we should only vaccine ourselves against dangerous diseases, and the plague of 2019 was not such a disease. No amount of propaganda can cover up for the fact that no-one knows more than a couple of healthy young people struck down by the plague, and no-one knows more than a handful of people who know someone healthy and young that got seriously ill.

This proves conclusively that the plague was a dud, because the average person knows somewhere between 200 and 300 people well enough to call them acquaintances, friends or family. That means that we have first hand knowledge of two to three hundred people, and second hand knowledge of between 40,000 and 90,000 people. That's a significant sample, and to believe that this sample is somehow different from the rest of the population is silly. We can therefore conclude, based on our own first and second hand information, that the plague was not as advertised on TV. Someone has been serving us lies, and the question we should ask ourselves before we get ourselves vaccinated is why these lies were pushed as hard as they were.

Xi Jinping

By Palácio do Planalto - https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/47945730807/, CC BY 2.0, Link