Records, Databases and Networks

Afghans are finding out the hard way that records and databases are dangerous when in the wrong hands. Taliban is using bank data, and payment records found in the US embassy, to pinpoint opponents and their whereabouts. Armed with such data, they round up people for punishment and execution.

The same goes for assets recorded in central databases. Such assets can be seized with a single data entry. That's why I transferred all my registered wealth to my children the moment I realized that I would come in conflict with the Norwegian tax code back in 2017. I also sold my house, closed my bank accounts and moved my remaining wealth into physical assets under my direct control.

The state tells us that their record keeping and databases are for our safety and convenience. However, that's not their main concern. The real motivation behind their record keeping is control. Hence, the moment we feel that the state is likely to turn against us, we must extract ourselves from these databases as best we can. I did this with success back in 2017, and my experiences can be found in my book on the subject.

Further evidence that the state is not interested in our safety can be found in the way they deliberately mismanage data that could be of use to us, such as the true number of people ill from the mRNA vaccine. Databases designed to store this data are only accepting filtered inputs that exclude adverse effects that happen weeks or months after the injection, and adverse reaction considered minor. My mother's allergic reaction was never recorded by anybody. An acquaintance of mine who's now dying from a combination of dementia and lung disease is similarly not recorded.

The state appears to have total control, and can therefore proceed with impunity in its campaign to tax, confiscate and mismanage. However, this misses an important point. There's an alternative to centralized databases available to us. There's the natural network of friends and relatives, and there's the high tech version of this, namely social media.

The network is a vague but powerful alternative to centralized databases. It's a flexible and fluid thing that can transmit data at astonishing speeds if properly used. Memes can go viral. Suddenly, some piece of information goes from unknown to widely accepted.

My feeling is that now is a good time to launch a counterattack on the centrally pushed narrative, and I suggest that my readers try this out themselves, if only as an experiment. When done correctly, no harm or blowback will come from this.

There's little conviction among our adversaries, despite a high level of compliance, so a well formulated comment will have power to propagate through the network. I've tested this on Facebook, and the results are as hoped for. People like my comments and reply to them in a friendly manner.

My strategy is to avoid putting anything on my Facebook wall. Rather, I comment on other people's posts, and I make my comments as reasonable and to the point as possible. I'm staying away from the temptation to lie or exaggerate. The comments are a mix of widely known facts and personal observations. They are all custom made to fit each individual post. I'm not spamming anyone. I only comment when it makes sense to do so.

The facts I refer to include one or more of the following points:

• The mRNA vaccine is not of the same kind as the Polio and Smallpox vaccines
• The virus isn't very dangerous
• The vaccine is ineffective against Delta and Lambda

The personal observations I make include one or more of the following points:

• I know more people ill from the vaccine than ill from the virus
• My guess is that each shot takes away a percent or two of our lives
• My vaccinated friends are more scared than my unvaccinated friends

Then I conclude rhetorically, when appropriate, that I don't think I'm the only one to see things this way.

I make a point of keeping my comments short. That's more effective than long stories with multiple points and observations. I also make a point of spreading my comments out as widely as possible. I want to spread the message thin, and avoid having it appear like a dense cluster among a tiny fraction of my Facebook friends.

If everyone opposed to the current vaccine rollout does something similar with their own style and personal angle, the message will soon appear everywhere and from sources widely removed from each other. The average Facebook reader will register this as confirmation of the narrative, and our assertions will be perceived as facts. They will in turn raise the alarm, spreading the message further.

The network effect is powerful, and time has come to make the most of it. If everyone does whatever they are comfortable with, there's a real chance of success with this low key approach. It will take some time for the network effect to kick in with full force, but don't be discouraged by this. Keep the message warm. Mention it from time to time, and without any urgency. Enjoy life and carry on! Remember that each of us are but one node in the total network. We don't have to pull the whole load ourselves. There are millions of people as fed up and frustrated as we are, and they're either ready to do their part or already working on it.

By Facebook, Inc. - http://en.facebookbrand.com, Public Domain, Link

Follow the Money

The Afghanistan debacle is proving itself revealing as to how the state has been corrupted by greed. It's clear that the war was not meant to be won. It was meant to be a money generating enterprise for weapons and security industries. When this proved itself so costly that it had to be stopped, the emperor was revealed to be naked. After 20 years of war, the security complex was unable to orchestrate an orderly retreat and evacuation.

Similarly, we have the pharmaceutical industry that has no interest in curing people. There's more money to be made in making sure that a certain percentage of the population is sick and in need of treatment. Hence, the vaccine is not meant to cure anyone. It's meant to keep people dependent on medication of various kinds.

Wind turbines and electric cars follow the same logic. They are not meant to save the planet. They're meant to generate profits for green industries. There is no real concern about the environment among the green profiteers.

This illustrates how the political establishment has been captured by greed. The state is firmly on the side of big capital, and has little to no concern for their subjects. This is the sort of moral decline that makes it all the more easy for hostile powers to do harm. The elite sees nothing wrong in inflicting harm on their subjects.

Unsustainable sustainability 

By © Hans Hillewaert, CC BY-SA 4.0, Link

The Problem with Purism

Taliban has been in charge of Afghanistan for about a week now, and it's clear that the new Taliban is only marginally more tolerant than the old Taliban of 2001. There are public executions. There are door to door searches for opponents, and at least one woman has been executed on the spot for not wearing a head scarf. Foreigners are also prevented form leaving the country. However, these are early days for the new regime. Much of this is typical maneuvering at the start of any radical regime change, especially one as disliked by the West as this one.

Preventing foreigners from leaving the country is a rather obvious move, and should not have come as a surprise to anyone. Washington DC blocked all Afghan assets under US control, so the Taliban resorts to hostage taking. This will lead to negotiations. The US will have to release assets in order to free hostages from the Taliban, which is terrible optics for the US and good for the Taliban who can use this to show strength both locally and abroad.

Door to door searches, and public executions of what is perceived as traitors is also to be expected. Taliban wants a comprehensive purge of its opposition. That's understandable after 20 years of bloody conflict. However, random executions of women for not wearing head covering is not likely to be something the Taliban leaders want to see too much of. Such extreme actions serves no purpose, neither at home nor abroad. Potential allies and business partners are repelled. Funding projects in Afghanistan becomes all the more difficult if the new regime comes across as too unhinged.

The Taliban leadership must find ways to reign in extreme elements in their own ranks. However, this is not as easy as one might think, because Islam is a purist religion. There's very little room for interpretation, open mindedness and forgiveness. Islam has rules for every aspect of life. Instead of one golden rule that applies to all people regardless of belief, gender and sexual orientation, Islam reserves this rule only for the pure. Make one mistake, and the rule no longer applies.

This makes it difficult to keep peace in Muslim countries, because the leadership must either be totally pure, in which case it must be totally ruthless towards anyone impure, or it must be totally ruthless to all opposition. For practical reasons, most Muslim countries end up with despots who are impure and hence totally intolerant of any opposition. The alternative is purism, which confines all laws to Sharia, which in turn is so burdensome that nothing gets done.

This is the challenge that the Taliban leadership is going to face going forward. How are they to combine international ambitions with their stated adherence to a strict interpretation of Sharia law? Any deviation from this law will be interpreted by some as impure, and hence sufficient reason to depose the leaders.

One way to deal with this would be to divide the various factions inside Taliban over the various regions, and then to control it all from Kabul. Hardliners get regions where strict Sharia is expected. More liberal leaning members get towns and cities. However, this will be a difficult balancing act. The leadership in Kabul will be under pressure to lean towards policies acceptable to foreigners and city dwellers. But this will provoke anger by purists in the provinces. The leadership becomes pressured from both sides, with the threat of assassination either way.

This problem exists wherever purism is widespread. We see it in political parties and movements with quasi-religious leanings. Religious zeal, unconstrained by a golden rule and the doctrine of sin and forgiveness, is a destructive and destabilizing force. This is the insight that Jesus brought to religion, and the reason liberty only exist in places where the golden rule is universally accepted.

Jesus

By Carl Bloch - https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVdd6dZPU3nrHUoYjTuN9VNudnSwm6_ckL4my_jNr9y0jQXOkTeF5lzEN7RsSyiIlatLoriO91OkOEHrVvJ3bToCcmcjVcgQ76Ios4s0OCGS2ivlOP2i3K8L1rG1Svqv2EdEDnGRpLzOC-/s1600/Sermon_on_the_Mount_Carl_Bloch.jpg and Carl Bloch, p. 313, ISBN 9788798746591, Public Domain, Link

Not Exactly Free

Of all the selling point's I've come across with regards to the vaccine, the stupidest one is the claim that the vaccine is free. As if that makes it a great deal. And it isn't free. Tax funded services are paid for by taxpayers. All that's added in way of services is the removal of choice. Had the vaccine been something we would've had to pay for directly, we would've had the choice to decline, and few would have taken it.

Who would willingly fork over good money for a jab that does nothing for our health? But this isn't the biggest error in the free stuff argument, because we're paying for the vaccine in more ways than one. Even if it's free of charge, we have to pay the piper. Our lives are shortened by the jab. That's the true cost of getting vaccinated. It's also the more effective argument against the free stuff story, because socialists don't absorb basic economic facts. However, they do relate to economy when their own life is at stake.

Next time anyone tells me that the jab is free, I'll ask them if they consider a reduction in life expectancy a fair price to pay for it. Then I'll throw out a small percentage like 1 or 3 as my best guestimate of what the jab costs. It's like inflation, only it's drawn from our life expectancy rather than our savings account. It's also like tobacco in that it hits unevenly. Some people are hit harder than others. Some have no reduction in their life expectancy, while others see their lives dramatically shortened. This will have health nuts stomped, because the analogy fits. Tell them that a vaccine shot is like smoking ten cigarettes a day. It's not very dangerous, but some meet an untimely death. If an argument ensues, reduce the number to five cigarettes. Be generous. Maybe as little as one cigarette. But to deny that there's a price to be paid for the vaccine is pure nonsense.

Wilting plant

The Greatest Medical Disaster Ever

We're almost certainly in the middle of the greatest medical disaster ever. The reason being the sheer scale of the experiment. Even a tiny negative overall effect will add up to a large number.

We're currently at more than 2 billion vaccinated people. It's reasonable to expect that more than 3 billion will be vaccinated by the end of this. That means that we only need a negative effect of around 3% to end up with 100 million lost lives.

With everybody by now knowing someone that's fallen ill from the vaccine, it's possible to argue that everybody taking the shot is on average losing 3% of their lives. Some die soon. Others go later. Some are obviously related to the vaccine. Others less so. But hardly anyone will truthfully argue that the vaccine has no ill effect. The 3% remains a plausible estimate even if a little high.

Furthermore, no-one has to die of the vaccine in order for this argument to hold. All that's required is a 3% reduction in lifespan. Once that has been accepted, we can point out that if everybody looses 3% of their lives on average, that's equivalent to 3% dead with the rest unaffected. Either way, we end up with loss of life corresponding to 100 million on a total population of 3.3 billion.

But we don't need 100 million lost lives in order for this to be a formidable disaster. 10 million lives is also a big number, and we get that with a negative impact of a mere 0.3%.

To get the overall negative effect we must offset the positive effect with negative effects of the vaccine itself as well as the diseases that the vaccine opens up for. Considering that the disease we are vaccinating against has a mortality rate of less than one percent, there's not much room for error before the vaccine become a net negative. The fact that the vaccine is less than 100% effective gives us even less wiggle-room.

The only reason we're still officially on the positive side of the equation is that many vaccine related illnesses are recorded as unrelated. This can be confirmed by noting cases of strange illnesses ourselves, and infer whether they are likely to be vaccine related without being officially registered as such. I know of several such cases, and I'm sure others do too. More cases will no doubt come with time.

I'd be surprised if we're not in fact at negative 0.3% by now, and at 3% or more by the end of this. Hence, by my reckoning, we're currently in the middle of the greatest medical disaster ever.

Delta

By Dcoetzee, F l a n k e r - Own work, Public Domain, Link

A Bioweapon from Hell

Whether released for a Wuhan bioweapon lab or not, the plague turned out to be a dud. As noted back in April 2020, the plague quickly morphed from something scary into something benign. Within months, we went from people dropping dead in the streets of Wuhan, to doctors dying in large numbers in Italy, after which the plague morphed into something close to harmless. If the plague was a bioweapon, it was very inefficient at killing anybody.

However, just as it was becoming evident that the flu was nothing to worry about, propaganda machines everywhere moved into overdrive. We had the miracle of Boris Johnson going from oxygen dependent patient to orator in the timespan of a week. We had grandma dying on TV every hour. It was insane, and it still is. The narrative has changed. The agenda has been revealed. The goal from the start was to get everyone vaccinated, no matter how useless the vaccine may be in actually protecting anybody.

This has led some people to conclude that the real bioweapon wasn't the flu, but the vaccine, and that the urgency with which the vaccine is administered is due to the fact that it is set to blow up within a given time. The enemy wants as many as possible vaccinated before people start falling ill in large numbers. But who would this enemy be, and how are they able to operate without anyone telling on them?

The answer to this can be found in the way corruption and lies combine into mega-lies that generally go by the name of evil. Every person involved is only doing a small bit of evil, usually for personal gains, but sometimes for the greater good. The corrupt find each other. They find ways to mutually benefit form their respective lies. They kick out the upright and install puppets that they can control. The entire system becomes one big corrupt cesspool of lies and mutual benefits. No one person has an overall picture of what's going on, with the exception perhaps of a small group of people intent on using the corruption in the system to their advantage.

If this small group of people are top agents of a foreign entity, the plot to deploy a bioweapon can be kept secret. All that's required is to use the corruption inherent in the system to first control key figures, and then make them act out their part of the greater plan in the belief that whatever they are doing is of little harm to the public and of great benefit to themselves. Top figures in the pharmaceutical industry are encouraged to develop an experimental drug based on patents held by the foreign agents. Politicians are encouraged to give the all clear for an early roll out. Tech giants and journalists are encouraged to push vaccine passports while keeping the population scared and ignorant of alternatives.

Once kicked into action, the corruption keeps everything rolling more or less on its own. Everybody in the corrupt cesspool have something to gain from everybody else. The fuel that drives this is easy money collected as taxes or printed out of thin air by central banks. The enemy makes sure that this money is accepted by them in return for goods during the timespan required for the bioweapon to be deployed. The financial plug is to be pulled once the bioweapon blows up in a big way.

A small group of foreign agents can in this way control and direct both the narrative and the deployment of the bioweapon without anyone figuring out what's going on until it's too late.

It remains to be seen if the bioweapon has a moment when it goes from mostly harmless to dangerous, or if it's designed to lurk around and do random damage. But it appears that something kicks in after about nine months. That's evident from google trends. There's a burst of interest in ways to un-take the shots, and it is happening now, nine months after the initial rollout.

The big wave of illnesses will come sometime this winter, possibly around Christmas, when the dollar may collapse in the face of shortages due to port congestions and supply line disruptions coming from China.

If this is indeed the case, getting vaccinated now will prove to be horrible timing, because the stories of illnesses related to the vaccine will only grow louder from now on. The freshly vaccinated will see people falling ill, and they will know that they will be next, and there's nothing that can be done to stop it. Additionally, money will lose purchasing power. Savings will be eroded at the very moment that they would be of most value. Unable to work due to illness and with no savings, a lot of people will find themselves in deep trouble.

Oxygen treatment

By James Heilman, MD - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, Link

A Baby from Hell

It's still early to say for sure, but it appears that something unpleasant happens nine months after vaccination. That's what I read into the search trend for "vaccine detox". Starting this month, there's been a marked increase in these searches, which makes me think that people who took the vaccine at the start of the vaccination program are now looking for ways to un-take it. After nine months of no consequences, something ugly has appeared.

The mask of the beast