Modern
theoretical physics is full of mathematical formulas, and woefully
lacking in simple explanations. Its jargon is convoluted and strange.
How are we for example to imagine a two dimensional energy momentum,
or a ten dimensional string. We are told that space is curved. But
what does that mean?
Yet,
the maths that has been produced over the years to describe physical
phenomena have been impressively accurate and demonstrably correct.
Modern engineering would be impossible without them.
For
all its complexity and weirdness, modern physics appears to work in
real life, and the consensus is that we really do live in a weird
world, pretty much unfathomable to mere mortals. We must therefore
humbly stand back as the professionals dig ever deeper into the realm
of strange mathematics and convoluted language.
However,
it may also be the case that the interpretations that have been
derived from observations and formulas are in fact incorrect, and
that a very much simpler model can account for the universe as we
know it.
Hoping
to find such a model for gravity, I came across the work of Morton
Spears, an American engineer with many patents to his name.
Morton
Spears (1921 - 2006) developed a simple model for both gravity and
the atom. In his work, published in 1993, he admitted that he may
have been over-simplifying things, but to the best of his knowledge,
his model did not violate any known observation. He concluded that
his model was as good as any, and since it was simpler than what was
currently used, he hoped to get some recognition for it.
Not
surprisingly, his work was largely ignored. Academia was not
interested in the opinion of an outsider, and since his model did not
solve any problems that the established models could not solve, why
bother to look into it?
However,
by the time I came across Morton Spears' work, it was clear to me,
and many with me, that theoretical physics is in fact in a state of
confusion. Things have become so complicated and convoluted that
no-one is able to understand it as a whole.
Thinking
myself reasonably well read when it comes to physics, I decided to
take Morton Spears seriously. In particular, I decided to use his
model of the atom to see if it could be used as a basis for a purely
mechanical model for the inner working of the universe.
I
thought it worth while to spend some time to see how far I could take
Morton Spears' model before I would have to give up.
To
my astonishment, and great delight, I managed to take it successfully
through all the weird and wonderful mechanisms that I wanted to
investigate. I had to add a lot of details to Morton Spears' model,
but at no point did I get completely stuck.
It
turned out that everything we know in the universe can be explained
by the use of three basic quanta, one positive, one negative and one
neutral. In this model, the positive quanta are covered with hooks,
the negative quanta are covered by hoops, and the neutral quanta are
a mix of hooks and hoops in equal measure.
Morton
Spears' three quanta. Hoop covered (-), hook covered (+), and a mix
(0).
There
is of course no way to know if the quanta are in fact covered by
hooks and hoops, but something to that effect must be the case. The
model described in this book is mechanical. It relies on things
colliding and sticking together, so the quanta cannot be completely
smooth.
At
the fundamental level, there are no forces acting magically at a
distance. Nothing happens without direct contact. Everything is made
up of little bundles of hooks and hoops.
There
is space, time, energy, and three Velcro-like quanta. From these
building blocks and a few simple rules, we can construct the entire
universe.
No comments:
Post a Comment