Unlike
the electron, which exists as a stable, relatively inert particle in
nature, positrons do not exist as independent particles. When they
appear, it's always briefly.
However,
they do exist, and we know that they have the same mass (inertia) as
the electron. We can therefore safely conclude that they are
identical but opposite to the electron. Instead of two negative and
one positive quanta, the positron is composed of one negative and two
positive quanta.
In
light of the Velcro model, the electron is a ball made mainly up of
hoops, and the positron is a ball made mainly up of hooks. Their
surface structures are in other words a little more like that of the
neutrino, which is an equal mix of both hoops and hooks.
This
make the electron and positron somewhat less reactive than pure
positive and negative quanta. This in turn explains why electrons are
able to resist reactions, while single negative quanta are so
reactive that they are hardly ever detected.
Coincidentally,
this also explains the strange fact that no positrons are present as
free particles. The reason for the absence of positrons is due to the
fact that hooks are a tiny bit more reactive than hoops. Anyone
who've played with Velcro knows that hooks have a small affinity to
other hooks, while there is no affinity between hoops.
The
hook covered positrons do not exist freely in nature because they
always get entangled into more complicated structures due to the fact
that they are slightly more reactive than electrons.
This
is the reason why the positively charged nuclei of atoms are enormous
structures, while the negatively charged electrons are minimal
structures.
The
non-existence of free positrons, and the odd disconnect in size
between atomic nuclei and electrons can both be fully explained by
the Velcro model.
No comments:
Post a Comment